Friday, May 24, 2013

Like Labyrinth Meets Pan's Labyrinth... Minus the Labyrinth

The Book of Lost Things
by John Connolly
p. 2006




In World War II era rural Britain, young David, struggling to make sense of the premature loss of his mother to a wasting illness and the rapidly-altered structure of his family, stumbles upon another world, one parallel to but inconceivably darker than his own. This fantastical landscape of corrupted fairy tales provides the boy with the means to step into adulthood, but not without cost.

John Connolly’s The Book of Lost Things visits all the familiar fairy tales—and some unfamiliar ones—but they are not the Disney-saturated family friendly tales popularized by American audiences; this is because John Connolly’s The Book of Lost Things is not a fairy tale for children. Though the hero is but twelve years old and its coming of age themes follow the classic paths of any otherworldly adventure novel, this fairy tale for adults dances around themes much closer to the original Grimm style than anything animated and slapped on a screen with celebrity voices.

I found it difficult to like David at first, as he is a rather selfish and stubborn child, but such is the case in the traditional coming of age tale. I can’t say that the David who emerges by novel’s end will become a cherished favorite in my arsenal of beloved characters, but there’s no denying that he is more mature, for all that he’s been through, and it softens his earlier nastiness considerably. The reason David gets a pass early on is because the adventures he goes through are so immeasurably dark and he doesn’t fall apart when faced with them. Coincidentally this is also the reason why David will never be a favorite—because I kept wondering time and again when this kid would crumble under the enormous burden of his ‘adventure’ and it was almost inconceivable that a child so young could manage it without losing his mind (then again, maybe he did...).

The moody, bleak presence of The Book of Lost Things is what drew me in to the story. I didn’t really know what to expect from this book, but it was definitely not the tainted fairy tales I found. David meets the woodsman while running from wolves, but in the fantasy world they are called Loups, and are the product of human girls and wolves, the former playing part of seductress to the latter in a bizarrely sexual twist to Little Red Riding Hood. The boy later happens upon Snow White and her bevy of dwarves, but is surprised to find that it was the dwarves who attempted to rid the world of the no-longer-fair maiden, and who are now enslaved to her detestable whims. A white knight on a quest takes David under his wing, but his motives and the object of his quest are not what you would expect.

Creeping up on David at every turn is ‘the Crooked Man,’ Connolly’s take on Rumpelstiltskin, a devilish figure that stalked David before his descent into this unknowable land and now wants something from him to fulfill his own unseen motives. The woodsman, the white knight, the Crooked Man—all play the part of David’s father figure at various stages in his development, just as the terrible and imposing female villains in David’s fantasy world represent aspects of his dual motherly relationships—his longing for his deceased beloved mother and his complicated tension with his beleaguered stepmother Rose. Central to the novel’s themes are David’s acceptance of change and the imperfect human nature of his parents.

As I understand it, The Book of Lost Things is a departure from Connolly’s regular style of writing, but you can tell it was a very special project for him. Despite his tendency to dip into cliches, Connolly was obviously interested in the topic of traditional fairy tales and presenting his own brooding spin on them. The final 150 pages of my edition were actually his in-depth research into the topic, and a collection of the versions of fairy tales Connolly lifted his ideas from.

If my hints as to the dark direction of this novel weren’t enough, I feel it’s worth offering this final warning, though I will try to be vague: there are not very many happy endings in this book. It is not all depressing either, but it is far from ideal. Like life, there are ups and downs and if summed up in a few lines, the downs can seem overwhelming, but—like life—you take from this book what you can and hope it gives you some insight on yourself for the journey through the woods.

Saturday, May 18, 2013

More Fun With Theodore Cogswell

The Third Eye
A collection of short stories
by Theodore Cogswell
p. 1968







[There is absolutely no story in this book that includes a giant, green, glob with one eye... God I love sixties sci-fi covers.]



Last summer I read a collection of short stories under the title The Wall Around the World, the first collection by science fiction author, Theodore Cogswell, and was so unexpectedly charmed by his sense of humor and style that I couldn’t possibly pass up an opportunity to get my hands on more of his work. When his second short story anthology, The Third Eye, presented itself to me, I was eager to read it.

In The Third Eye, Cogswell employed that same sly, playful attitude he used to delightful effect in The Wall Around the World. I was expecting it this time, but it did not disappoint. Cogswell strikes me as the kind of guy who would have been really a real hoot to hang out with, as he never seems to take things too seriously. Even the most serious stories of Cogswell’s aren’t without their hint of the absurd. It's refreshing to read something like this from a sixties science fiction writer, because so many of those I read tend to take themselves very seriously, and it's nice to see someone poke fun at the genre every now and then.

My favorite stories are probably “Machine Record,” in which a mad scientist carries on a comedic dialogue with his assistant as he struggles with his chosen line of work, and “A Spudget for Thwilbert,” a lighthearted tale of unexpected fortune when two swindlers try to screw over a hapless galactic traveler by foisting their unusable diet product on him.

My only complaint about this copy of The Third Eye is that it was horribly edited. I personally noticed several typos, and on at least two occasions, the wrong name was used, possibly because Cogswell initially had another name lined up for a character then changed it later, only to miss one. It didn’t ruin my enjoyment of the stories, but it did take me out of them for a bit.

Post perusal of this second piece of work by what I had hoped would be my new favorite sci-fi author, I was disappointed to discover that Cogswell only ever released two collections. Aside from a random “Star Trek” novel which I have no interest in delving into, the only work I will be able to find by Cogswell now will be individual, unreleased short stories among the forty or so he has supposedly written. At this point I must have read half of his legacy and as Cogswell passed away in 1987, there won’t be any more. It’s a shame he has never written a full length novel, as I would very much like to see that. I suppose I’ll just have to find comparable authors to enjoy instead.

Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't

Catch-22
by Joseph Heller
p. 1961




Catch-22 strikes me as one of those books that you either love or you hate. Having heard glowing praise for it over the years, I had high hopes finally sitting down to conquer this 450-page beast, and I’m sorry to say my feelings gravitate more towards the latter sentiment.

I wanted to like Catch-22, I really did. It’s clever and witty and has a lot of interesting quotable bits that stick with you, but there were too many things I couldn’t get past.

There isn’t really a plot to Catch-22, per se. It’s a war novel and it’s not. While it does indeed take place entirely in a World War II setting and revolve around themes of war, it doesn’t dwell on those themes and you could almost lift those elements out and still have the same novel. It is a loosely connected, non-sequential collection of stories revolving around the random, often absurd experiences of Captain Yossarian and his friends and superiors as they navigate a war none of them really understand their part in.

Since a majority of the chapters are named after a specific character in Yossarian’s realm, I assumed early on that this would be a character-driven book, and perhaps in some people’s opinions, it is, but I had a difficult time differentiating between characters since they all generally followed one of two types: either they were naive pushovers or blustering, bombastic jerks and no matter which division they landed in, they were sure to be totally oblivious. That last commonality is at least excusable to me, since one of Catch-22’s central themes is the nonsensical side of war. Everyone, no matter how high they were in a position of power, usually had no idea what was going on and just pretended as though they did to get by. I wanted to like the characters, and by the end of the story, some had stood out enough for me to start caring about them, so of course at that point everyone was summarily killed in a nonsensical way that had little to nothing to do with actual combat. Just when I was starting to like them.

My other major gripe with Heller’s classic is the writing style he chose. It’s not the non-chronological presentation that bothers me—some times parsing out the order of things can be half the fun of discovering a new story—but rather the rambling, repetitive, stream-of-consciousness aspect of the book. Stream of consciousness is hit or miss in general, but the seeming lack of direction was concerning about 100 pages in when I realized I still had no idea what type of novel I was reading.  The repetition in the dialogue was amusing for a few pages but about the 50th time I read the exchange between an officer and an enlisted man where neither side spoke clearly, I started to wonder if I was reading the literary equivalent of a 3 Stooges bit.

Catch-22 is the first book I’ve encountered this year that I really struggled to get through. It’s extremely frustrating and not the least bit direct. I despised most of the characters and those that amused me didn’t seem to have a point. The abrupt change in tone in the final ten chapters or so was jarring and didn’t sit well with me either. Reading this book is more like listening to an old guy with burgeoning dementia reminisce about the war; he may have some interesting things to say, but he talks about things as he remembers them and rambles for far too long about topics that have no relevance.

I will contend that I may not have fully understood this novel, impatient as I was to breeze through it about halfway in, when I realized I wasn't enjoying it. I’ve heard that some people who hated Catch-22 the first time loved it the second time around and maybe that’ll be me, but I’m giving myself a wide berth before I attempt this one again. On the other hand, perhaps Heller’s style of writing is just not for me and no amount of time will get me to look back on this one fondly. I guess I’ll just have to get back to you on this one.