by Markus Zusak
p. 2002
My sole impetus for picking this book up was that it was
written by the same author who wrote The Book Thief, Markus Zusak. While I could find a lot of similarities
stylistically, I Am the Messenger is,
on the whole, a vastly different kind of story than The Book Thief. While I preferred the latter, this story is not
without its merits, and this tale of slacker cab driver Ed Kennedy and his
playing cards certainly boasts a much
happier ending than that of Liesel Meminger and her books.
At 19, Ed is an underage cab driver in an unspecified city
(but given the slang used and the fact that Zusak lives there, one can assume
it’s a large city in Australia), getting by with his equally directionless
friends in the months following his father’s death. They work, they drink, they
play cards, they make fun of his buddy's broken down car or Ed's smelly old dog Doorman, and generally avoid serious things. Lather, rinse, repeat. That is, until a bank holdup which Ed
inadvertently foils interrupts their day to day lives. At first, nothing seems different,
but shortly after, Ed begins to receive playing cards that have
clues on them, clues that lead him to people with lives more complicated than
his, people he must help. On his own, Ed decides he must follow this odd twist
of fate and change these people’s lives by delivering the messages he must
decipher by observing them, and in the process, Ed learns a lot about himself
and what he is truly capable of.
As I’ve said, stylistically, a lot of comparisons can be
found to Zusak’s most prolific work, The
Book Thief. Both are written in a sparse, dreamy style, with sentences
broken up and thoughts passed out haphazardly in an almost
stream-of-consciousness style. This is because both stories are narrated by
characters who are also players in the book—in this case, Ed, in the case of The Book Thief, Death. Thematically,
both stories emphasize the beauty in little acts of kindness and the power in
humanity. I found both of these comparisons to be a bit more jarring in I Am the Messenger. Perhaps this is
because it is my second outing with Zusak and recognizing the patterns takes me
out of the story. Or perhaps it is because the writing style—while minimalistic,
makes the whole thing feel a bit melodramatic at times, like Ed/Zusak is
delivering the Greatest Story Ever Told and wants us to know it. Plenty of
times in I Am the Messenger I found
myself wishing he would just tone it down a little bit and stop making every
sentence feel like the revealing twist at the end of a thrilling movie.
[Speaking of movies, both of the books I’ve read of Zusak’s
would translate very well to screen, and I’m a little shocked that none of them
have been commissioned yet. The quirkiness of I Am the Messenger in particular could be very fun if presented
visually. Ed Kennedy is a great character, but the effort to present him as a
down-to-earth, average teenager dumbs down the poetry of his actions. To see
them from an outside perspective might be nice.]
When we arrive at the actual
twist to I Am the Messenger—that is,
who is sending the cards and why—it’s not really a big surprise, or if it is,
then it’s not a very satisfying one. I almost wish Zusak had just ignored the
impulse to include a twist, as I feel it detracted from the ending. Also, by
this point in the book I was so frustrated with Ed’s random logic and leaps to
conclusions that did not readily present themselves that I didn’t even care
about the person behind it all. That is the only thing that really bothered me
about this book—Ed’s reasons for following the cards doesn’t make sense to me
at all. It’s one thing to try to better yourself and hope for destiny, but the
way in which Ed so accurately interpreted his cause—not to mention some of his
dubious methods of fulfilling them—seemed wrong to me, like Ed had privileged
knowledge the reader was not made aware of, which we know he did not. It just
seemed like a lazy way to move from plot point to plot point. Also, there is no
way the guiding force behind the novel’s events is anything but supernatural,
and if that is the case, why bother having a ‘logical’ explanation behind it at
all?
No comments:
Post a Comment