A Novel of Daybreak
by John Barnes
p. 2010
John Barnes’ Directive 51
is the latest in the slew of post-apocalyptic fiction novels in my repertoire,
but unlike most of the others I’ve read, it is not a product of Cold War
propaganda, but rather a modern day take on the apocalypse, in that it hits us
where it counts—technology. Directive 51
is the first in a trilogy of novels (titled the Daybreak trilogy) detailing an
attack on the world using bio-terrorism that targets all mechanical and plastic
materials, effectively reducing us to pre-industrial-revolution times.
Let’s start with what exactly Directive 51 is. It’s real, for
starters, a term coined under the Bush administration, but existing, in some
form, under some other title, for a couple decades, according to the afterword
by Barnes. It’s the rule that states what happens when the president is found
unfit to lead the country, and that is precisely what happens when Daybreak—the
name for the underground eco-terrorist movement—is unleashed on the planet. The
search for a fitting president in the crisis loosely provides the basis for the
first installment in this trilogy... and it’s exactly as boring as it sounds.
Directive
51 is fundamentally an ensemble story, but indispensable government
agent, Heather O’Grainne, often takes center stage. Heather works for the department of 'Future Threat Assessment’, a group meant to anticipate crimes and prevent
them, and since the story picks up on the very morning that Daybreak (a
worldwide coordinated event amongst thousands of different groups and millions
of participants) is unleashed, I think it’s safe to say that Heather is
probably terrible at her job. But
we’re supposed to see her as the smartest person in the room, so it’s probably
a good idea to adopt a ‘Just shut up and go with it’ attitude from the start.
A lot of the characters in this story have the potential to be
interesting. A lot of the first part follows various ‘Daybreakers’ as they
deposit their instruments of destruction around the U.S. and a couple of them
are mentioned later, but for the most part, they are dropped without ceremony
or just plain presented as brainless, selfish hippies. If Barnes was intending
for their cause to be sympathetic, he failed miserably, but I don’t think he
was; I think he had every intention of bashing young eco-crusaders for the
dirty hippies he thinks they are.
Barnes isn’t very transparent in general. Despite the fact that two
party politics really have nothing to do with the conflict, it is repeatedly
stressed that the acting president when Daybreak occurs is Democratic, and when
he suffers an untimely mental breakdown, his replacement—another Democrat—quickly
turns tyrant and stages a coup, actually succeeding in murdering the first
president so he can’t reclaim power. The new president is a Republican who had
been planning to run in the upcoming election anyway. It is mentioned that he
leans towards religious fundamentalism, leading me to suspect that this president will also be problematic
when he tries to sneakily impose his beliefs on the American people, vulnerable
in this time of crisis... but that entire thread is dropped and it turns out
this president is, like, the best prez evah and exactly what America NEEDS...
until he gets martyred in a nuclear attack. His replacement? Another Democrat
who lets power go to his head... of course. Very subtle, Barnes.
Dropping story threads is something else I have issues with. I
understand that this is a trilogy and this is only book one, but nothing really
happens. There are a small handful of actions scenes interspersed in a 500 page
book, and the rest is all talking, and not even fun or interesting talk at
that. Lots of talk is forgivable if the reader is enjoying themselves, but Barnes’
dialogue is forced and his characters are too bland. All of them are either
no-nonsense government officials who were too stupid to do anything right or
dirty hippies who only thought of themselves. I didn’t find myself rooting for
any of them and any of those I thought could
be interesting were dropped halfway through. So much for that.
But Directive 51’s
biggest problem is in the subversion of its genre. The reason I love reading
post-apocalypse stories is to see how ordinary people adapt and survive, but
none of Directive 51’s characters are
regular people; they are the most
important people in the country, literally, and as such they don’t really
get to experience the full realm of Daybreak firsthand. They get showers and
electricity and access to the last working forms of transportation where others
do not, because they are that
important. The full depth of human struggle of Daybreak—the starvation, the
riots, the ravages of disease—are not felt and these characters are not
relatable.
I will give Barnes one thing though—his ratio of female to male
characters is impressive and his women are strong and smart and not totally lacking in a couple spare
dimensions... The only time I raised an eyebrow was when Heather—our lead hero
and at one point, somehow the only voice of reason and stability in the entire
government—decided that the best idea, in the wake of a worldwide attack
kickstarting the end of the world as we know it, was to get pregnant
immediately with her sure-to-not-survive-the-apocalypse handicapped boyfriend.
Because, sure.
This foolhardy logic aside, Heather did a great job as lead and I’m
sure she and all the other characters introduced in Directive 51 continue to grow and have adventures in the next two
novels in Barnes’ trilogy... but I’m clearly not the target audience for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment